Sainz questions sporting equity after Overtake Mode omission
Carlos Sainz has delivered one of the most pointed criticisms of the FIA this season after a Race Control error left Sprint Qualifying at the Singapore Grand Prix unevenly balanced.
The Williams driver was eliminated in SQ1, finished 22nd and last, and argued that the governing body failed to protect the principle of sporting equity.
The FIA has since acknowledged the mistake. In a statement, a spokesperson described a human error in Race Control, unrelated to a separate timing issue that also affected SQ1, which meant Overtake Mode was not available after the red flag period.
Why Monaco Will Not Redraw Its Historic F1 Circuit
The second and third segments of the session were not affected.
What happened at Marina Bay
The opening segment of Sprint Qualifying was stopped by a red flag after debris from Sergio Pérez’s Cadillac fell onto the circuit.
A red flag automatically suspends Overtake Mode, the additional electrical deployment available to drivers, on safety grounds.
The expectation was that the extra power would return once running resumed. It did not. When the omission became apparent, the mode was activated for 27 seconds and then switched off again, after Race Control raised a concern about sporting fairness.
Because the window was so short, its effect varied from car to car depending on where each driver happened to be on the circuit during a timed lap.
FIA Human Error Skewed Singapore Sprint Qualifying
Separately, a timing problem meant that a number of laps were not registered at the end of SQ1, so an incorrect order appeared as the chequered flag fell.
The timing fault was linked to a Formula 1-managed software issue, while the Overtake Mode lapse was placed squarely with Race Control.
Sainz’s account
Sainz was one of six drivers eliminated in SQ1, alongside his teammate Alex Albon, Racing Bulls’ Arvid Lindblad, Aston Martin’s Lance Stroll and the Cadillac pair of Valtteri Bottas and Pérez.
He had set the 15th-fastest time in first practice. After the session he said his lap had been run with roughly half a second less power than any other lap of the weekend, and that half of the field had enjoyed a quicker engine than the rest.
His reference to Malaysia pointed to the controversy that followed the aborted start at the previous round, when the FIA stopped the formation lap as soon as a problem was detected.
Sainz’s point was one of consistency: if intervention was warranted then, why was a session with unequal power allowed to run to its conclusion?
Mercedes ADUO Engine Upgrade to Miss Singapore GP
In his view, the FIA was content for half the cars to qualify with more power than the other half.
He was candid that the power issue was not the only factor.
Sainz said Williams had brake problems in first practice, changed components for Sprint Qualifying and were still not comfortable with the car’s braking performance.
Williams respond
Team principal James Vowles shared the frustration but kept perspective.
He said the incident did not change the fact that the car’s performance is not where the team wants it to be, yet he maintained that without the issue both Williams cars had the potential to progress to the second segment.
The team is now turning its attention to extracting the most from Saturday.
Why the principle matters
Sporting equity is a cornerstone of how a championship is judged: every competitor should operate under the same conditions during the same session.
When those conditions diverge, even briefly, the integrity of the resulting order is open to challenge.
That is why a few seconds of enabled power drew such a strong reaction, and why the episode lands as the second technical mishap to hit the sport in less than a week.
FIA Confirms Two-Step Fix for F1 Wet-Weather Power
It is also worth keeping the competitive picture in proportion.
Sainz’s last-place classification reflected a difficult night on several fronts, including brake concerns and a car that the team itself acknowledges is short of target pace.
The Overtake Mode error, however, introduced a variable that no driver or engineer could control, and that is the core of the grievance.
The weekend ahead
At the front, Max Verstappen took sprint pole ahead of George Russell. Sainz lines up 22nd for the 21-lap sprint on Saturday, on a street circuit where overtaking remains notoriously difficult.
At the time of writing, no change to the sprint grid had been announced. Whether the FIA responds to the broader criticism, or treats the matter as a closed administrative error, will shape how drivers and teams view the consistency of decision-making as the season continues.
For now, the episode leaves a familiar question hanging over a sport that prizes technical precision.
Cooling Vests Split F1 Drivers Before Singapore GP
The FIA has accepted responsibility for the error, but accountability for its sporting consequences remains a matter of debate.
For drivers such as Sainz, whose evening was shaped by factors beyond his control, the answer is unlikely to arrive in time to change the result.
Follow us
Never Miss an F1 Update!
Join the AutodromeF1 Formula 1 community for real-time race commentary, paddock news, and 2026 calendar updates across your favorite platforms:
