Steiner Unveils Historic Audi F1 Masterplan
Former Haas Formula 1 team principal Guenther Steiner has offered a measured reading of the current driver market that places Audi among the more credible longer-term destinations available for 2028. Speaking on the Red Flags podcast, Steiner observed that a number of drivers are showing interest in the German manufacturer’s works project and specifically identified both George Russell and Carlos Sainz as figures who could reasonably be considered candidates once the current contractual window opens.
The comments, first reported in detail by Motorsport.com and subsequently covered across multiple specialist outlets, do not claim any agreement has been reached. They represent an external assessment of market dynamics rather than an insider disclosure from either Mercedes or Audi. Steiner’s central observations remain consistent across the reporting: Audi is attracting attention because the project appears to be progressing, the team is largely set for 2027, and seats may become available for 2028; Sainz is viewed as a clear candidate; and Russell, now sharing a garage with the rapidly developing Kimi Antonelli, is understood to be evaluating options beyond an indefinite stay at Mercedes.
Steiner’s Assessment of Audi’s Position
Steiner’s remarks on Audi were unambiguous in their tone of cautious optimism. “There’s a lot of interest from drivers to go to Audi for 2028,” he stated. “For next year they are pretty set, but there is maybe a possibility in 2028 at Audi. That’s quite an interesting place because they’re making good progress. It seems to be on track, what they are doing. I think there would be quite a few candidates. Carlos [Sainz] for sure.”
The former Haas principal framed the manufacturer’s effort as one that has moved beyond early doubts. Audi completed its full takeover of the Sauber organisation at the start of the 2026 season, installed experienced leadership including Mattia Binotto, and has continued the development of its power unit programme that began years earlier under Volkswagen Group backing. Steiner’s characterisation of the project as “on track” and “making good progress” reflects a broader paddock perception that the German works team is building methodically rather than chasing short-term results at the expense of structural foundations.
The inside story of the crucial winter dialogue that accelerated Antonelli’s Mercedes trajectory
This assessment carries weight precisely because Steiner has previously been more critical. In 2024 he described Carlos Sainz’s decision to reject an earlier Audi approach in favour of a privateer seat as “worrying,” arguing that a top-line driver’s preference for a non-manufacturer team raised questions about the project’s readiness and attractiveness. The shift in Steiner’s language two years later—from concern over perceived shortcomings to recognition of tangible progress—suggests that the internal changes implemented under the current management structure have registered with experienced observers.
A works programme of this scale offers drivers something midfield privateer teams rarely can: long-term resource commitment, technical identity, and the possibility of shaping a manufacturer’s first serious Formula 1 chapter. For drivers who have already experienced the intensity of top-team environments, the opportunity to occupy a central role in a developing works effort can outweigh the short-term security of remaining in a competitive but hierarchical structure elsewhere.
George Russell’s Position at Mercedes
Russell remains under contract at Mercedes. Team principal Toto Wolff has publicly stated that the current pairing of Russell and Kimi Antonelli is the preferred line-up for 2027, and Russell himself has reaffirmed his commitment to the team. These official positions are clear and have been repeated in recent months.
Steiner’s reading of Russell’s situation nevertheless focuses on the longer horizon. “I think George is also looking around now, knowing that he’s now with Kimi. He doesn’t want to stay with Kimi for the rest of his life, because there he knows where he is for the rest of his life. So, he is trying to find new opportunities.”
The observation centres on the internal dynamic created by Antonelli’s rapid rise. The young Italian has established himself as a genuine force within the same car, altering the competitive balance that previously existed between Russell and his previous teammates. Steiner’s point is not that Russell is under immediate threat of being replaced for 2027, but that a driver of Russell’s experience and ambition will naturally consider whether remaining in a dual-frontline structure indefinitely aligns with his career objectives. In Steiner’s framing, the prospect of competing for “the throne” against a teammate who is both younger and already highly competitive may prompt a search for a project in which leadership responsibility is clearer.
This assessment does not rest on any confirmed contact between Russell’s management and Audi. It is an interpretation of market psychology grounded in contract timelines and observed performance trends. Mercedes has shown no public inclination to alter its 2027 plans, and Russell’s own statements have consistently emphasised continuity. The speculation therefore remains exactly that: informed external commentary rather than evidence of an imminent departure.
REPORT: Hockenheimring submits official proposal to Formula 1 for race calendar comeback
Carlos Sainz as a Named Candidate
Steiner’s explicit naming of Sainz—“Carlos [Sainz] for sure”—places the Spaniard at the centre of the same conversation. Multiple reports have described Sainz as strongly linked with Audi’s longer-term plans as the manufacturer continues its build-up.
The historical context is relevant here. When Sainz elected to join Williams rather than accept an earlier Audi offer, Steiner publicly characterised the decision as concerning for the manufacturer’s image and ability to attract elite talent. That earlier rejection occurred at a moment when Audi’s programme was still in a more formative stage. Steiner’s current comments imply that the intervening progress has altered the calculation for drivers of Sainz’s calibre. A seat that once appeared premature may now look more coherent as a multi-year commitment.
Sainz’s own situation continues to evolve independently of these remarks. He has spoken previously about prioritising the Williams project in the near term while acknowledging that longer-term decisions would be evaluated in due course. Steiner’s identification of him as a leading candidate for Audi in 2028 does not constitute confirmation of negotiations; it simply registers Sainz as one of the more obvious names that would surface if and when Audi begins to shape its post-2027 driver roster.
The Structural Appeal of a Manufacturer Project
What distinguishes Audi in the current market conversation is the combination of factory resources, regulatory stability, and the opportunity for a driver to become synonymous with a manufacturer’s Formula 1 identity. Unlike customer teams or midfield operations that must continually justify their place in the hierarchy, a works Audi programme carries the expectation of sustained investment across chassis, power unit and organisational development.
Hamilton accepts blame for costly run of errors but questions ‘inconsistent’ jump start judgments
Steiner’s description of the project as “on track” aligns with the measured public messaging that has emerged from Audi itself. Leadership figures have outlined a multi-year trajectory in which 2026 and 2027 serve primarily as construction years, with a more significant performance step anticipated around 2028 and genuine championship contention targeted later in the decade. For a driver evaluating options beyond the immediate contractual cycle, that timeline offers a coherent narrative: join a works team that is still ascending rather than one that has already reached, or is defending, its peak.
The contrast with remaining at a top team that already fields two highly competitive drivers is obvious. In the latter environment a driver must continually prove relative superiority; in a developing works project the same driver can occupy a more defining role while the team’s competitive level rises around him. Steiner’s comments capture that distinction without overstating its immediacy.
Assessing the Reliability of the Story
It is important to locate Steiner’s remarks accurately within the information ecosystem of Formula 1. They constitute an informed external analysis delivered on a podcast, not a leak of confidential negotiations. No official confirmation has emerged from Mercedes, Audi, Russell’s management or Sainz’s representatives that any substantive discussions regarding 2028 are under way.
Mercedes’ public position remains one of continuity through at least 2027. Russell has echoed that commitment. Audi, for its part, has not indicated any imminent change to its current driver pairing. The story therefore rests on three observable realities: the existence of a multi-year works project that is perceived to be progressing, the natural contract cycles of experienced drivers, and the internal competitive pressure created by a high-performing young teammate.
These elements are sufficient to generate credible speculation. They are not sufficient to support claims of an imminent transfer. Responsible reporting distinguishes between the two. Steiner himself framed his comments as market observation rather than revelation of completed deals. Subsequent coverage that treats the remarks as definitive proof of Russell’s departure or Sainz’s imminent move exceeds what the original statements justify.
McLaren set to race new rotating rear wing after key data breakthrough at Hungaroring
Indicators That Would Alter the Picture
Several developments would move the conversation from informed speculation toward concrete possibility. A change in Mercedes’ public messaging regarding Russell beyond 2027 would be the most direct signal. Any indication from Audi that it is actively evaluating high-profile drivers for 2028, rather than concentrating exclusively on its current line-up and technical programme, would similarly elevate the discussion. Sainz’s own contractual clarity and public positioning would also shape the landscape.
Until such signals appear, the situation is best characterised as follows: Audi is increasingly viewed as one of the more attractive long-term projects on the grid; Carlos Sainz is regarded by experienced observers as a natural candidate for a works seat in 2028; and George Russell is understood by those same observers to be considering his options in light of the competitive dynamic at Mercedes—without any formal agreement having been reached.
Conclusion
Guenther Steiner’s comments on the Red Flags podcast provide a useful external calibration of the 2028 driver market. They highlight Audi’s growing credibility as a works destination, identify Sainz as a leading candidate, and place Russell’s longer-term future in the context of his partnership with Antonelli. The remarks are neither speculative fantasy nor confirmed transfer news. They are the considered view of a former team principal who has watched both the manufacturer’s development and the internal Mercedes dynamic at close range.
For the moment the contractual realities remain unchanged. Mercedes intends to retain its current pairing through 2027. Russell has restated his commitment. Audi continues its methodical build. The value of Steiner’s intervention lies in its reminder that driver careers are finite and that the most compelling opportunities often appear when a manufacturer project is still ascending rather than fully mature. Whether Russell, Sainz or others ultimately pursue those opportunities will depend on performance trends, contractual windows and the concrete progress Audi continues to demonstrate over the coming seasons.
The conversation Steiner has opened is therefore best treated as an early marker rather than a concluded chapter. It accurately reflects the structural forces currently shaping the market without pretending that those forces have already produced a definitive outcome.
For more F1 News
Follow us
https://Facebook.com/AutodromeF1
2 thoughts on “George Russell, Carlos Sainz and the Emerging Appeal of Audi’s 2028 Formula 1 Project”