Wolff and Vasseur say no penalty for staff over safety fears
Mercedes and Ferrari have confirmed that employees may skip the final two races of the 2026 Formula 1 season in the Middle East if they feel unsafe travelling to the region, and neither team will penalise anyone who stays home. The announcement covers the Qatar Grand Prix, scheduled for late November, and the season-ending Abu Dhabi Grand Prix in early December.
The commitments came from team principals Toto Wolff and Fred Vasseur during the press conference held at the São Paulo Grand Prix. Their remarks responded to growing questions in the paddock about security, logistics and personal choice as the calendar moves toward its final stretch.
Team Principals Confirm No Penalty for Staff Absences
Wolff made the Mercedes position explicit. Anyone who prefers not to travel will face no consequences inside the team. “If someone feels he or she doesn’t feel comfortable in travelling, then it’s something that I would always respect,” he said. He added that an absence could even give another colleague valuable race-weekend experience, and he stressed that the decision would not change the working relationship.
At the time of the Brazilian event, Wolff noted that no Mercedes employee had yet raised the matter internally. That detail matters, because it suggests the policy is a precaution rather than a response to a wave of staff requests.
Ferrari adopted the same approach. Vasseur confirmed that the team would respect any individual decision. “In any case, we will respect the decision of the team member. If someone feels something and doesn’t want to come, we will respect the decision,” he stated. He explained that Ferrari remained focused on the immediate race schedule and that formal internal discussions about the Middle East races had not yet taken place, although the principle of individual choice would be upheld.
Confidence in Formula 1 Safety Monitoring
Both principals expressed confidence in how Formula 1 is handling the situation. Wolff said he was following the guidance of Formula 1 chief executive Stefano Domenicali and FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem, who are monitoring international travel advice, airline operations, regional warnings and input from local governments. He stated that if conditions deteriorated, those two leaders would act first to protect personnel scheduled to travel.
This layered approach matters for team staff, who often make travel decisions based on a mix of official guidance and personal circumstances. By placing the primary monitoring responsibility with the sport’s governing structures, the teams give employees a clear message: the organisation is watching conditions, and individual comfort will still be respected.
The statements arrive against a backdrop of heightened sensitivity in the paddock, influenced in part by rider concerns and limited participation at the concurrent MotoGP event in Qatar. Wolff addressed the parallel by emphasising personal choice, while criticising public commentary that, in his view, sometimes prioritised media attention over informed assessment.
FIA and Formula 1 Position on the Season Finale
Subsequent reports indicate that the FIA has extended a similar option to its own staff, allowing those uncomfortable with travel to the region to stay home, with replacements arranged where necessary. Formula 1 has maintained that the races remain on the calendar and that teams support completing the season as planned, while continuing to monitor developments closely.
It is worth stating clearly what has and has not been confirmed. The teams have confirmed an opt-out principle for personnel. Formula 1 has not announced any change to the calendar. Reports about the FIA’s arrangements describe a similar staffing flexibility rather than a decision to alter the schedule. Readers should therefore treat the Qatar and Abu Dhabi events as scheduled, while recognising that circumstances can change and that official announcements remain the definitive guide.
ALSO READ: Maffei: Formula 1 Likely Headed for a Private Deal
What the Policy Means for the Championship Run-In
For Mercedes and Ferrari, the policy formalises a practical reality. Large teams already rotate personnel across a demanding calendar, and limited absences can be absorbed without major disruption. Trackside roles, from mechanics to data engineers, are typically supported by deep benches at factory bases, which allows a replacement to step in with relatively little friction.
The explicit commitment that nobody will be pressured to travel if they feel unsafe also sends a signal about priorities. Formula 1 operates under intense commercial and sporting demands, yet both principals placed individual wellbeing alongside the sport’s operational requirements. For employees who spend much of the year away from home, that assurance carries weight, because it removes the fear that a personal safety judgement could damage a career.
There is also a reputational dimension. Teams compete for talent as fiercely as they compete for points, and a visible welfare commitment can strengthen an employer’s standing among engineers, mechanics and operations staff. By stating the policy publicly, Mercedes and Ferrari have set a benchmark that other organisations on the grid may be asked about as the finale approaches.
As the championship heads into its final stretch, the message from two of Formula 1’s leading teams is consistent. The Qatar and Abu Dhabi Grands Prix are expected to go ahead, logistics continue, and the paddock’s attention remains on the title run-in. Yet staff who judge the circumstances unsuitable will be free to remain at home, without professional consequence. Wellbeing, in short, now sits openly beside operations on the agenda.
Several developments will be worth following in the coming weeks: whether any personnel formally opt out, how other teams respond to the same question, and whether Formula 1 or the FIA issue further guidance on travel and security. Any such update is best confirmed through official channels before it is treated as final.